The narrative endorses revenge as an unproblematic solution.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. It is never addressed.
• D. Only in certain contexts.

Answer: (B)

The idea being tested is how the narrative treats revenge: whether it is presented as a simple, justified fix or as something messy with consequences. If the story follows revenge and then shows the harm it causes, moral ambiguity, or ongoing cycles of violence, it’s signaling that revenge isn’t an easy, unproblematic solution. That’s why the statement is false—the narrative does not endorse revenge as a clean, problem-free remedy.

In many narratives, pursuing revenge leads to collateral damage, ethical compromises, or outcomes that fail to bring true resolution. The tone, character arcs, and consequences all push readers to question whether revenge truly solves anything. Because of that nuance, claiming revenge is unproblematic would be inaccurate.

(The other options don’t fit as well: the story clearly engages with revenge rather than ignoring it; it isn’t presented as unproblematic across all contexts, nor is it confined to only certain contexts in a way that would make the claim true.)